Head to head
Rolec EVO vs EVEC VEC03: The £80 between budget and value
The EVEC VEC03 is the cheapest smart charger you can buy, but the Rolec EVO's extra £80 buys a better warranty, superior solar integration, and an install bill that often ends up lower. For most buyers, the Rolec is the smarter spend.
At a glance
Quick stats
The £80 between cheap and clever
The EVEC VEC03 costs £369 — the lowest sticker price of any OZEV-approved smart charger on sale in the UK. The Rolec EVO costs £449, which is £80 more. On a spreadsheet, the cheaper unit wins. On your electrician's invoice, it is not that simple.
- EVEC VEC03 — £369, tethered, 5-metre cable, three-year warranty. The price leader, with rough edges in the software.
- Rolec EVO — £449, untethered, five-year warranty, CT clamp and PME detection in the box. The one that costs less to *install*.
Why the Rolec EVO's install bill matters more than its price
Both chargers include built-in Type A RCD with 6 mA DC protection — good. But the Rolec EVO also includes PME/PEN fault detection inside the unit. The VEC03 includes PEN protection too, which should trim your install, but the Rolec goes further: it bundles a CT clamp for dynamic load balancing and solar integration, where the VEC03 sells the CT clamp separately.
In practice, a typical Rolec EVO installation saves £150–£250 against a charger that needs external earthing solutions or a separate CT clamp. That £80 price gap between the two units can easily invert once the electrician's bill arrives. A VEC03 install quoted at £450 and a Rolec install quoted at £350 leave you paying the same total — except you now own the charger with the longer warranty and better solar modes.
Software and smart tariffs — neither charger excels
Neither the Rolec EVO nor the EVEC VEC03 has a direct API link to Octopus Intelligent Go or OVO Charge Anytime. Both rely on app-based scheduling, which means you set your own off-peak window and trust the charger to follow it.
The difference is reliability. The EVEC app is the VEC03's weakest point — customer reports of intermittent scheduled charging are persistent enough to count as a pattern, not isolated bad luck. The Rolec EVO's app is newer and still maturing through over-the-air updates, but the underlying connectivity is stronger: Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0, and Ethernet, versus the VEC03's standard Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. Neither offers 4G fallback, so both depend on your home network — but the Rolec's Wi-Fi 6 radio handles congested networks with less fuss.
If smart-tariff automation is the priority — if you want a charger that chases half-hourly rates on Octopus Agile without your involvement — neither of these is the right buy. The Ohme Home Pro at £535 does that job properly. For a simple two-rate tariff like Octopus Go at 8.5p/kWh between 00:30 and 05:30, manual scheduling is fine, and both chargers can handle it.
Solar buyers: the Rolec EVO earns its keep
The Rolec EVO includes Eco and Eco+ modes. Eco+ diverts only surplus solar to the car; Eco blends grid and solar to maintain a minimum charge rate. The CT clamp is in the box. For anyone with panels already on the roof, this is a functional solar diverter at £449 — well below the myenergi Zappi GLO at £750, though without the Zappi's depth of granular control.
The VEC03 supports solar integration on paper, but the CT clamp is sold separately, and the implementation is less proven. If solar diversion is part of the plan, the Rolec is the obvious choice between these two. For a deeper solar comparison, the Zappi GLO vs Rolec EVO page covers the trade-offs at that price point.
Tethered vs untethered — a genuine fork
The VEC03 comes tethered with a 5-metre Type 2 cable. The Rolec EVO is untethered only — you supply your own cable, which adds £40–£80 for a decent one. That narrows the real-world price gap, but some buyers prefer untethered for tidiness or because they share a socket with a visitor who brings their own lead.
Five metres is short. If your parking spot puts the charge port more than about four metres from the wall box, you will feel it. The Rolec, being untethered, lets you buy whatever length suits the driveway.
The verdict
Buy the EVEC VEC03 if:
- Lowest possible unit price is the deciding factor — £369 is £369
- You want a tethered cable included and your charge port is within easy reach
- You qualify for the £500 OZEV grant, which covers the unit outright and chips into the install
Buy the Rolec EVO if:
- You have solar panels or plan to add them — Eco+ mode and the included CT clamp settle it
- You want a five-year warranty from a manufacturer with a decade of commercial charging behind it
- You prefer an untethered socket and the flexibility to choose your own cable length
Between the two, the Rolec EVO is the better purchase for most households. Its install savings recover the £80 premium, its solar integration is meaningfully more capable, and its warranty runs two years longer. The VEC03 is not a bad charger — it is a cheap one, and the distinction matters. If the budget is immovable, the Sync Energy Wall Charger 2 at £362 is worth a look as an alternative at the same price tier. But £80 more for the Rolec buys peace of mind that lasts half a decade. That is where the value sits.
Detailed breakdown
Full specs comparison
| Specification | Rolec EVO | EVEC VEC03 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Power Output | 7.4kW (single-phase only) | 7.4kW (single-phase); adjustable 3.7/7.4kW |
| Cable Length | Untethered (use own cable) | 5 metres |
| Connector | Type 2 socket | Type 2 (tethered) |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.0, Ethernet | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Ethernet |
| Dimensions | 260mm × 260mm × 112mm | 320mm × 193mm × 105mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 5.01 kg |
| IP Rating | IP54 + IK10 (weatherproof + highest impact resistance) | IP55 (datasheet lists IP54 and IP65 in different places) |
| Certification | OLEV/OZEV approved, Red Dot Award 2024 | CE, UKCA (EN IEC 61851, EN 62196); OZEV-approved |
| IK Rating | — | IK08 |
| Operating Temperature | — | -25°C to 50°C |
| Protections | — | Type A RCD 30mA + DC 6mA, PEN fault, over-current, over/under voltage |
| Protocol | — | OCPP 1.6J |
FAQ

