Head to head
VCHRGD Seven Pro vs Andersen Quartz: £263 for a prettier box
The VCHRGD Seven Pro offers more features for £263 less — solar modes, RFID, OCPP, and a longer cable. Buy the Andersen Quartz only if the seven-year warranty and eleven colour finishes matter enough to pay for them.
At a glance
Quick stats
£263 buys features — or it buys finish
The VCHRGD Seven Pro costs £432. The Andersen Quartz costs £695. That £263 gap is the entire argument here, and it resolves faster than most.
- VCHRGD Seven Pro — £432, black box, loaded: solar modes, RFID, OCPP, 7.5-metre cable, three-year warranty.
- Andersen Quartz — £695, eleven finishes, seven-year warranty, IP65, fewer smart features, and an uncertain OZEV status.
One charger tries to give you everything in the spec sheet. The other tries to look like it belongs on a Georgian terrace. They are not competing for the same buyer — but if you are cross-shopping them, you need to know what that £263 actually gets you.
What the VCHRGD includes that the Quartz does not
Start with the cable. The Seven Pro's tethered version ships with 7.5 metres; the Quartz's standard tether is 5.5 metres, and upgrading to 8.5 metres costs another £99 — pushing the Andersen to £794 before installation.
Then the smart features. The Seven Pro has OCPP 1.6J, which means it can talk to third-party energy platforms beyond its native Powerverse app. It ships with two RFID cards and a cable lock. It runs two distinct solar modes — Solar Export, which uses surplus generation, and Solar Only, which charges exclusively from your panels. The CT clamp for both solar diversion and dynamic load balancing is in the box.
The Quartz has solar diversion via its included CT clamp too, but no dedicated surplus-only mode. No RFID. No OCPP. Its smart-tariff support covers Intelligent Octopus Go and OVO Charge Anytime — useful, but narrower than the Seven Pro's Intelligent Go integration combined with OCPP flexibility.
On paper, the VCHRGD is the more capable charger. By a comfortable margin.
Where the Andersen earns its premium — if it does
Two places. First, the warranty: seven years versus three. That is a meaningful difference. If the Powerverse app platform behind the Seven Pro falters, or if VCHRGD — a newer brand — reorganises, a three-year warranty offers limited comfort. Andersen has been shipping home chargers since 2016 and backs the Quartz for seven years. For some buyers, that alone is worth the premium.
Second, finish. Eleven standard colours, plus optional Accoya wood and carbon inserts. If your charger sits on a visible front wall and you care what it looks like — and some people care a great deal — the Quartz is one of the few units on the market designed as furniture rather than electrical equipment. The Seven Pro comes in black. Only black.
IP65 on the Quartz versus IP54 on the Seven Pro is a minor advantage for exposed, rain-lashed walls, though both are adequate for typical UK installations.
The OZEV question
The VCHRGD Seven Pro is OZEV-approved. For eligible renters and flat owners, the £500 grant covers the £432 unit outright and contributes to install costs too.
The Andersen Quartz is *not confirmed* on the current OZEV eligible-chargepoint list. If you qualify for the grant and choose the Quartz, you may not receive it. At £695 without grant support, the effective gap against the Seven Pro widens further. Verify the Quartz's status before committing — do not assume approval is coming.
Smart tariff fit
Neither charger is the tariff-optimisation specialist in the catalogue. That job belongs to the Ohme Home Pro, which handles half-hourly rates on Octopus Agile natively. Both the Seven Pro and the Quartz integrate with Intelligent Go, which is the tariff most Tesla owners should be on anyway — 7p/kWh across a six-hour overnight window, with the supplier managing charge slots. On a fixed-window tariff like Octopus Go at 8.5p/kWh, both chargers schedule identically. No advantage either way.
If tariff intelligence is your priority and you are weighing the Seven Pro, the Ohme Home Pro vs VCHRGD Seven Pro comparison is the more useful page.
The verdict
Buy the VCHRGD Seven Pro if:
- You want the most features for the money — solar modes, RFID, OCPP, 7.5-metre cable, all at £432
- You qualify for the OZEV grant and want the unit cost covered entirely
- You have solar panels and want a dedicated surplus-only charging mode
Buy the Andersen Quartz if:
- A seven-year warranty matters more than a longer feature list
- Your charger sits on a visible wall and finish is a genuine priority
- You are already committed to the Andersen ecosystem and do not need the A3's hidden cable
For most buyers — particularly those with solar, those who want OCPP flexibility, or those watching the bill — the Seven Pro is the stronger purchase at £263 less. The Quartz is a good charger wrapped in a better shell, but the premium buys aesthetics and warranty length, not capability. Put the £263 towards a decent install and a year of Intelligent Go rates instead.
Detailed breakdown
Full specs comparison
| Specification | VCHRGD Seven Pro | Andersen Quartz |
|---|---|---|
| Max Power Output | 7.4kW (single-phase only) | — |
| Cable Length | 7.5 metres (tethered version) | 5.5m or 8.5m (7kW) |
| Connector | Type 2 (tethered or untethered) | — |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth (optional 4G) | Wi-Fi 2.4GHz, Bluetooth BLE 5 |
| Dimensions | 300mm × 180mm × 90mm | 286 × 172 × 110 mm |
| Weight | ~4 kg (tethered) | — |
| IP Rating | IP54 + IK10 (weatherproof + impact-resistant) | IP65 |
| Certification | OLEV/OZEV approved | — |
| Max Power (1ph) | — | 7.2kW |
| Max Power (3ph) | — | 22kW (+£195) |
| Rated Current | — | 32A |
| Connection | — | Tethered or socketed (Type 2) |
| Weight (installed) | — | 3.4–5.2 kg |
| Operating Temp | — | -25°C to +40°C |
| Earth Protection | — | PEN fault detection (BS 7671 722.411.4.1) |
| RCD | — | Internal 6mA DC (EN 62955) |
| Warranty | — | 7 years |
| OZEV Approved | — | Not confirmed — verify before publishing |
| Finishes | — | 11 colours + optional Accoya / carbon inserts |
FAQ
Frequently asked questions.
Related comparisons

